"G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3" (gbodyman)
02/04/2015 at 11:52 • Filed to: None | 0 | 93 |
The 305 in my Cutlass gets 30 HP/L. What about you guys?
cletus44 aka Clayton Seams
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 11:53 | 0 |
My 1969 383 V8 gets 46 hp per liter.
Thunderface
> cletus44 aka Clayton Seams
02/04/2015 at 11:56 | 0 |
Better than the cutlass...
Cé hé sin
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 11:57 | 1 |
Anyone with a ship. Really big ones can have only 4 or 5 hp/litre.
Thunderface
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 11:57 | 1 |
2006 sienna: 70hp per L
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> cletus44 aka Clayton Seams
02/04/2015 at 11:57 | 0 |
Impressive!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Thunderface
02/04/2015 at 11:58 | 1 |
Nice!
cletus44 aka Clayton Seams
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 11:58 | 0 |
Pre-smog big-blocks are a force to be reckoned with haha
Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 11:59 | 0 |
Murdersofa gets 55hp/l
Civic gets 66.26 hp/l
Shit, thats better than I thought
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> cletus44 aka Clayton Seams
02/04/2015 at 11:59 | 0 |
Amen. Big-blocks solve everything. I bet if Stephen Harper had a big-block, he wouldn't be half as bad.
HammerheadFistpunch
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 11:59 | 1 |
I see what you are going for, but its a little unfair to do hp/liter on lazy low revving high torque engines.
but since we are playing that game, the Toyota 2F engine had 32 hp/liter.
CKeffer
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:00 | 1 |
My NB Miata has 77.7778 per liter (according to the factory rating at the crank), and my FoST has 126 per liter.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> HammerheadFistpunch
02/04/2015 at 12:00 | 0 |
Dayum, Son!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
02/04/2015 at 12:01 | 0 |
Yeah, the HP/L is surprising on those things.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> CKeffer
02/04/2015 at 12:01 | 0 |
Nice!
roflcopter
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:02 | 0 |
I'm at 184.3hp/l if you go by the factory rating.
mr2gud2u
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:02 | 0 |
Does it could if it's not stock?
mr2gud2u
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:03 | 0 |
Count not could. DAMN YOU AUTO CORRECT!!
HammerheadFistpunch
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:03 | 0 |
EDIT: I don't have a 2F, my 1FZ-FE is
47.1 hp/liter.
61.1 ft-lbs/liter though.
CKeffer
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:04 | 0 |
Hoping to improve that number for the miata eventually with a little forced induction in the form of a supercharger, but that's a ways out yet I think. Though hopefully it'll go up to ~86.1 after a few bits get here and I get them on the car.
EL_ULY
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:05 | 0 |
My 99' A6 Avant Quattro V6 I feel like is about 180hp by now so... 64HP/L
My sister in laws '13 Camry V6 on the other hand.... 77 HP/L
I mention the Camry because it is the best HP/L in the family fleet lol
V8Demon - Prefers Autos for drag racing. Fite me!
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:06 | 0 |
Stock or modified? The standard out put non-HO 5.0 my Cougar rolled off the assembly line with was right there with you 30/L. Now the figure is the flywheel is around 80.... It's amazing how choked up '80's motors are in stock form. The supercharger on my 4.6 takes me to over 103/l on that motor at the flywheel, roughly 88 at the tires. My bone stock 2.0 in a 2012 Focus gets 80/l at the flywheel.
Let's do some math there with the first and last figures.... non H.O. 5.0 V8 stock has less advertised HP than a new 2.0. The engines are in vehicles that are 25 years apart.
I for one am thankful for the plethora of aftermarket support for early fuel injected V8 cars. I'm also thankful the malaise era is behind us with regards to performance. Ido ever so much love some of the styling it gave us though.
My citroen won't start
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:08 | 0 |
Subaru gets 72,2 hp per litter
Both Citroens get 70 hp per litter
Chris_K_F drives an FR-Slow
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:09 | 0 |
I'm at 100 hp/L at the crank in the FR-S.
Based on average whp figures, I'm probably around 86.5hp/L give or take a few.
MoFinWiley
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:09 | 0 |
110hp/l and the tq to match (pump gas)...twin turbo 05 GTO
Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again.
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:10 | 0 |
123.125hp/L on my FiST, but it's FI so I cheated.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> HammerheadFistpunch
02/04/2015 at 12:12 | 0 |
My dad's Series II pickup with a diesel in it: 62 hp, 2.25l -> 27.5hp/l.
Porsche924GTR
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:15 | 2 |
Sold my 944 Turbo that had a Porsche 2.5L/I4 producing over 400hp.
100hp / cylinder and 160hp/L !
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:16 | 0 |
I'm at 32.5 for my Rover gas. My dad's Rover diesel is worse: 27.5.
My Rabbit diesel was also at 32.5.
Captain of the Enterprise
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:21 | 0 |
05 crown vic non police 48 hp/L
NaturallyAspirated
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:23 | 0 |
The EJ25D in my Subaru Legacy got 66 hp/l when it was new. No idea what it's getting now.
XJDano
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:24 | 1 |
Stock 55hp for the only liter
Luc - The Acadian Oppo
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:32 | 0 |
24hp/L out of the 6.6L 400ci in my 79 Lincoln
Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:33 | 0 |
56.6hp/l
TheHondaBro
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:37 | 0 |
My Accord makes 80 HP/Liter.
472CID
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:47 | 1 |
At their worse Cadillac's 500 (8.2l) was rated at 190hp ~23hp/l
In their gross rating heydays it was closer to 50hp/l
MasterMario - Keeper of the V8s
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:49 | 0 |
Got you beat...barely. My F150's straight 6 has 29.6HP/L.
145HP (265ft-lb of torque though) for 4.9L
KatzManDu
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:53 | 0 |
2002 BMW 520d gets 68.7 bhp/litre or 1.13 bhp/cu in. That's not too bad!
44444444444
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:53 | 0 |
2004 Volvo V70R 115hp/l stock.
(With a bigger turbo/forged internals/a lot of money it could be 240hp/l!!!!)
2000 Volvo V70XC 79hp/l stock
1998 Range Rover 4.6 47hp/l
BigBlock440
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 12:59 | 0 |
Don't know the actual figures, but it feels like 200hp on the butt dyno out of 7.2L, so 27-28 hp/L?
Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:00 | 0 |
My Honda does.... 118 HP/L.
wat
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
02/04/2015 at 13:08 | 0 |
Nice!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> 44444444444
02/04/2015 at 13:09 | 0 |
Sweet!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> KatzManDu
02/04/2015 at 13:10 | 0 |
Especially for a diesel.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> MasterMario - Keeper of the V8s
02/04/2015 at 13:10 | 0 |
Wow.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> 472CID
02/04/2015 at 13:10 | 0 |
That's so bad, it's impressive.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> TheHondaBro
02/04/2015 at 13:10 | 0 |
Not bad. Not bad at all.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer
02/04/2015 at 13:10 | 0 |
Nice!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Luc - The Acadian Oppo
02/04/2015 at 13:11 | 0 |
Holy crap, you're even worse off than me!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> XJDano
02/04/2015 at 13:11 | 1 |
You could say it's the one true liter.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> NaturallyAspirated
02/04/2015 at 13:11 | 0 |
Not too shabby.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Captain of the Enterprise
02/04/2015 at 13:11 | 0 |
Not bad.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
02/04/2015 at 13:12 | 0 |
Wow.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Porsche924GTR
02/04/2015 at 13:12 | 0 |
Sweet!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again.
02/04/2015 at 13:12 | 0 |
FI is not cheating.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Chris_K_F drives an FR-Slow
02/04/2015 at 13:12 | 0 |
Nice!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> My citroen won't start
02/04/2015 at 13:12 | 0 |
Not bad at all.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> V8Demon - Prefers Autos for drag racing. Fite me!
02/04/2015 at 13:13 | 0 |
Wow. That's amazing.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:13 | 0 |
My dad's pickup Rover is also the larger size, but it has an overdrive, so it can actually be driven 60+.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> EL_ULY
02/04/2015 at 13:13 | 0 |
It's always a camry, isn't it?
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> CKeffer
02/04/2015 at 13:14 | 0 |
That sounds awesome!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> HammerheadFistpunch
02/04/2015 at 13:14 | 0 |
Not bad at all.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> mr2gud2u
02/04/2015 at 13:15 | 0 |
Yes.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:15 | 0 |
Oh yeah, and it's nothing compared to anybody who has a GM 6.2 diesel. 6.2L diesel with between 130 and 143HP based on year. 21 to 23 hp/L.
EL_ULY
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:17 | 0 |
for this post and in my fleet... yes.
KirkyV
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:17 | 0 |
Well, I have 59 horsepower, and 1.1 litres so... About 53hp per litre?
MasterMario - Keeper of the V8s
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:25 | 0 |
haha at least the torque makes up for it a bit...and the engine will run for ever so I'm okay with it
Jgonzo432
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:25 | 0 |
2010 Volvo S80 T6 - 93.66 HP/L
2011 Ford Edge - 81.43 HP/L
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> MasterMario - Keeper of the V8s
02/04/2015 at 13:26 | 0 |
Fair enough.
and 100 more
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:28 | 0 |
I feel bad. My engine gets 71.66 hp/liter (172 hp/2.4 liters).
It's neither good enough to be considered impressive, nor bad enough to be considered dismal.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> and 100 more
02/04/2015 at 13:29 | 0 |
Which car?
Opposite Locksmith
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:34 | 0 |
365hp/2.5liters = 146
Little Black Coupe Turned Silver
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:38 | 0 |
Cobalt SS Supercharged, not stock: 123 hp/l
HP is from a Mustang dyno, not butt dyno.
and 100 more
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:42 | 0 |
Jeep Patriot, bone stock drivetrain. Silver Mist Metallic. 16" alloy wheels.
It is the epitome of "average".
KatzManDu
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:43 | 0 |
It's useless below 1500 rpm, but I can get the rear tires to lose grip :)
CallMeTURBO
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:46 | 0 |
my '94 325i prolly makes around 190 at the crank, so about 76 ish hp/liter.
Not bad until you consider my 1.6 liter '99 civic si made 160hp... So about 100 hp/liter
But the 325i has so much more torque it doesn't even matter
thejoemeyer
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:54 | 0 |
The N/A 3.2 in my A4 gets 79.7 hp/L. ....But probably less up here in Denver
I'mJustOutbackXTing
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 13:56 | 0 |
My 2.5L outback xt makes 100hp/l.. not too bad
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Opposite Locksmith
02/04/2015 at 14:04 | 0 |
Nice!
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> CallMeTURBO
02/04/2015 at 14:05 | 0 |
Torque makes all the difference.
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Little Black Coupe Turned Silver
02/04/2015 at 14:05 | 0 |
Nice!
. .
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 14:41 | 0 |
My CLK gets 96 hp per litre. The Fiat is just shy of 37 hp/l.
Galileo Humpkins (aka MC Clap Yo Handz)
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 15:34 | 0 |
2015 Q5 - 110 hp/liter
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> . .
02/04/2015 at 15:37 | 0 |
Nice!
Averyrm - GTI YUP
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 16:03 | 0 |
My 1970 Mercedes 220D - 26.8 hp / liter. 0-60 is over 30 seconds.
The RX-8, depending on whose displacement you go with, is 183 hp/L
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Averyrm - GTI YUP
02/04/2015 at 16:04 | 0 |
Holy crap, even my Cutlass does it under the 10 second mark!
Averyrm - GTI YUP
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 16:10 | 0 |
Its quarter mile takes less time than the 0-60
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Averyrm - GTI YUP
02/04/2015 at 16:14 | 0 |
Wow.
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 16:18 | 0 |
50hp/liter
banjo cat ghost of oppo past
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 16:32 | 0 |
@1998cc's abouts 160hp/liter, and climbing
ly2v8-Brian
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 19:25 | 0 |
295 Hp 4.8L = 61.5 HP/L
mr2gud2u
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 19:43 | 0 |
82hp/L for me.
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/04/2015 at 21:44 | 0 |
4.2l & 110hp = 26.2hp/l on the Jeep
2l & 132hp =66hp/l on the Neon
2.8l & 190hp = 67.5hp/l on the BMW
bob and john
> G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
02/05/2015 at 16:41 | 0 |
aims for best: had a 600CC sport bike in the garage 208hp/l (sure, bike wasnt mine..it was just in the garage...but ha it was in my garage)